Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:17

Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
The Aging Brain: 6 Things You Should Be Doing to Slow Cognitive Decline - CNET
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Orioles Place Ryan Mountcastle On 10-Day IL, Recall Coby Mayo - MLB Trade Rumors
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Voluptates qui qui deleniti laborum et sed corrupti.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thousands of Netflix fans gather for Tudum - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Australia's Qantas to close budget airline Jetstar Asia - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Meet the "prince of dragons" that started the tyrannosaur dynasty - Earth.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Bikini-clad Brooke Shields celebrates milestone birthday on beach vacation: ‘This is 60!’ - Page Six
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?